Book Extract:Available Light: Omar Badsha and the Struggle for Change in South Africa

DAN Magaziner the Yale University historian and academic who wrote Available Light: Omar Badsha and the Struggle for Change in South Africa.

DAN Magaziner the Yale University historian and academic who wrote Available Light: Omar Badsha and the Struggle for Change in South Africa.

Published Mar 6, 2025

Share

In-article Gallery Widget not supported yet.

Available Light Extract

Over the course of 1948, Malan’s government began to consolidate its authority

over the state bureaucracy by replacing monolingual English speakers with its

Afrikaans-speaking supporters. The hope was that a more motivated state would enforce

already existing regulations. Meanwhile, the government planned an aggressive

legislative agenda to build off the Union’s preexisting segregationist regime. Interracial

marriage was already illegal; Malan’s administration would outlaw interracial

sex. African residents were already confined to urban townships and rural reserves;

Group Areas legislation would redefine spaces across the country and disaggregate

mixed neighborhoods like Grey Street. With the war’s end, the Communist Party

and other potential troublemakers were already being surveilled; Malan’s government

would ban them from aboveground existence. Both government and business

slowed as usual over the year-end “festive season,” anticipating a busy year to come.

January 1949 was the height of summer in Durban. On Thursday afternoon,

January 13, a fight broke out down the road from the Goodwill Lounge, after an Indian

cart peddler violently attacked a young African named George Madondo, who

later claimed only to have been looking through a restaurant’s window. “Suddenly

someone grabbed me from behind and pushed me,” Madondo told a reporter. “It

was a big Indian. . . . Then the glass broke, and I fell with my head bleeding.” Victoria

Street was packed at the time, full of African and Indian workers on their way

home or to the bus rank. By the time Madondo regained his bearings, “other Natives

had caught the Indian.” A pitched battle broke out and spread quickly through

the neighborhood. Dozens of people ended up in the hospital after large groups

of African men careened through the District, smashing windows and breaking

into stores, while Indians responded in kind, raining bricks, stones, or glass bottles

down onto the crowds from the rooftops. Fires broke out across the area.

 

Thursday’s violence petered out with nightfall, leaving clothes, shoes, and discarded

goods scattered on the streets. The next morning it started again, as people

who resented their treatment at the hands of Indian bus and storeowners, among

other slights, unleashed their anger on Ismail and his neighbors’ homes. The Badsha

family patriarch commanded 7 Douglas Lane’s front room, from where he could

look out over the veranda and see the block of flats then under construction across

the narrow street. That was where he smoked his pipe or welcomed his grandchildren

up onto his lap. On Friday morning someone threw a brick through the front

room’s window, shattering glass onto the floor. Chorta had joined his brothers to

debrief the previous day’s events; he grabbed a hunting rifle, ran out onto the street,

and fired a single round skywards. Smoke from the day before still hung in the air.

Years later, Omar would claim this event as his earliest memory.

Ismail’s family was fortunate to only suffer a broken window; some neighbors

lost their stock or their shops. As Friday ended and Saturday began, it was apparent

that Grey Street’s residents were many times more fortunate than their poorer confederates

who lived further afield, in places like Cato Manor, where the African and

Indian working class were jumbled together in indistinguishable shacks. Terrible

violence broke out there over the weekend. On Booth Road in Cato Manor, “Indian

buses were burned and every Indian house or shop . . . was destroyed.” Indian

children were trapped in a house and burned alive. When an African man tried to

rescue them, he too was trapped and killed. Rumors circulated of a widespread uprising,

rape, and looting; in some places the reality was not much better.

Ebrahim and his brothers kept their rifles close at hand until the police and

South African military finally acted to get the situation under control. The final toll

counted nearly two hundred people dead, thousands injured, and almost half of

Durban’s Indian population displaced. Community welfare organizations tried to

care for the “pitiful clusters of refugees, clutching the little valuables rescued from

their homes,” who sought shelter at local police stations or huddled together in

open fields. Ismail and Ebrahim’s family remained secure on Douglas Lane, while

many of their politically involved neighbors fretted about what the violence meant

for African and Indian unity.

Some people called the events a riot, others a pogrom. Whatever the terminology,

in time the three awful days became a literal textbook example of “ethnic

riots.”50 In what remained of January and the months that followed, however, the

NIC and the ANC’s response was more triage than sociological analysis. Xuma condemned

the violence, although other ANC representatives conceded that Africans

did have some legitimate grievances. Indian community leaders meanwhile tried

to assuage residents’ fears that it could happen again. The argument became that

the only way to prevent such things was to demonstrate solidarity with the African

majority, in word and deed. Together, the ANC and NIC leaders stated that “the

fundamental and basic causes of the disturbances are traceable to the political, economic

and social structure of this country . . . and the preaching in high places of

racial hatred and intolerance.”